Clinical Decision Support & Medical Search Engine for Healthcare Professionals (NPI Required).
OpenEvidence is trusted by hundreds of thousands of verified healthcare professionals to support high-stakes clinical decisions at the point of care with answers that are sourced, cited, and grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature.
OpenEvidence is the fastest-growing and most widely-used clinical decision support platform in the world–used daily, on average, by over 40% of physicians in the United States, spanning more than 10,000 hospitals and medical centers nationwide.
Now sourcing from over 300+ medical journals, as well as the FDA and CDC. OpenEvidence is an official AI partner of The New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of American Medical Association (and their 11 specialty journals), and has content agreements, partnerships and collaborations with:
NCCN
ACC
ADA
ACEP
AAFP
AAOS
AAOHNS and more.
OpenEvidence is only available for health care professionals. Users must verify their health care professional status before using OpenEvidence.
TESTIMONIALS
“I've been using OpenEvidence for the last week - it has been amazing! Able to narrow down on results quickly and find information that I wasn't able to do with Google/PubMed searches on my own.” - Dr. John Lee, MD. Physician & Faculty Member, Harvard Medical School
“OpenEvidence can be the foundational technology to power all clinical decision tools.” - Dr. Antonio Jorge Forte, MD. Director of MayoExpert, Mayo Clinic
“OpenEvidence is more up-to-date than UpToDate. And more useful regardless, since it’s interactive, and you can ask it questions, and get very specific answers about specific medical fact patterns in a patient case. It’s like having a curbside consult with a team of expert physicians, but that you can carry around with you in your pocket.” - Dr. Ram Dandillaya, MD. Clinical Chief, Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
“I am in community practice and medical director of a community cancer center. OpenEvidence has been an incredible lifeline for daily practitioners.” - C.J., Oncologist
“OpenEvidence is absolutely fantastic. I use it a gazillion times a day.” - J.A., Neurologist
“OpenEvidence’s efforts to make medicine more evidence-based are invaluable. The shift from judgment to calculation can reduce the level of noise currently found in medicine.” - Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize Laureate (In Memoriam)
“It is light years ahead of the next best medical oriented AI I have used.” - R.E.., Oncologist
I have been using this platform for over 6 months now, and it is both revolutionary and disruptive. Whether updating medical knowledge or searching for actionable up to date treatment plans, this AI reference is invaluable and beyond game changing. My patients (and myself) benefit from its powerful results on a daily basis. The answers are both thorough and accurate with extensive reference if you are an AI naysayer. Only negative I can synthesize is clinicians could be rendered obsolete with this phenomenal technology. In its current iteration, this tool is an invaluable adjunct to modern day medical practice. Adopt it or be left to perish!Much gratitude and many thanks to all who have made this technology readily available to all medical professionals and at no monetary cost. Truly amazing. Keep up the stellar work!
Great, but use with caution
JenniferB76
This is a fantastic app. It generates fast, clear and succinct answers to questions, but there are some issues to be aware of.I have found that in practice, you REALLY need to use the right prompts, or some of the information you receive may be incomplete or misleading. For instance, it may not provide you information pertinent to special populations (ie pregnancy), unless you think to ask for this specificity. I also found that when asking about treatment options, it may provide options but will not go into details of the risks associated with these options unless specifically prompted. I also noticed it will sometimes generate information that is not fully correct if the prompt is too general. For instance I typed “magnet runaway pacemaker.” I expected to get information on the runaway pacemaker condition and how to use a magnet to stabilize it. But what I got was “A magnet runaway pacemaker refers to a malfunction of a pacemaker that results in erratic and rapid pacing due to the inappropriate activation of the device’s magnet response mode.” I think this will eventually be an incredible application of AI for as a tool for medical practice. Looking forward to future updates.
On Incorporating OpenEvidence into the Busy General Internal Medicine Practice
CharlieG100
I find that I have made OpenEvidence a tool I use every single day and multiple times daily at that. For a year I used it often but held it at arms length while sizing up the technology. I found it provided zero factual errors in that time. While in the early days I found a few of the searches/answers to be superficial and of no real help, that changed over time so that in the past year the quality, depth and breadth of answers have been remarkable. I find it provides concise reviews of content I have not recently visited and every day I learn something. I wholeheartedly recommend this tool for busy Internists.
Very clinically useful
Dmish33
Incredible resource for clinicians. Gone are the days of sifting through endless journal websites/clinical trials trying to find an EBM answer to my clinical questions. Most clinical questions I have in an obscure, uncommon situation where the data is not clearly established, with time constraints it is impossible to sift through endless journal articles to find the answer myself. OE harnesses powerful AI technology to do the data sifting for me instantaneously, and can tell me what the data says on an obscure, clinical query where there is no obvious answer from traditional sources. Linking the journal studies/info is extremely helpful so I can go straight to the source myself if needed.
* NEJM, JAMA, and NCCN content partnership
* Earn CME credits while using OpenEvidence with a new in-app experience
Version 2.8.32
The developer, OpenEvidence Inc., indicated that the app’s privacy practices may include handling of data as described below. For more information, see the developer’s privacy policy .
Data Linked to You
The following data may be collected and linked to your identity:
Contact Info
Identifiers
Usage Data
Data Not Linked to You
The following data may be collected but it is not linked to your identity:
Diagnostics
Privacy practices may vary, for example, based on the features you use or your age. Learn More
Accessibility
The developer has not yet indicated which accessibility features this app supports. Learn More
